Home > An Error > An Error Has Occurred Encrypted Session Key Is Bad

An Error Has Occurred Encrypted Session Key Is Bad

Contents

But messages sent by Jonathan and Kevin had problems. Our Professional Services team can help you deploy a complete solution. KGPG = Yes PGPD = Yes NAPGP = Yes BC = Yes 3.2. Of course, he's using ckt,so he has available all the same algorithms that I have available onmy machine. Check This Out

Both programs were able to > decrypt what BouncyCastle had encrypted, so what's the problem with > Network associates PGP Freeware version 6.5.8 ??? Bad Session Key error when trying to decrypt a file encrypted with Robo-FTP This article applies to Robo-FTP v3.6 and later. Some messages have been sent, where the session key used wasAES256. Or what you're telling me is to analize the encryption > >> process of BouncyCastle and based on that try to figure out what could > >> BC is doing wrong useful source

Key Pad

This happened for KGPG, > PGPD and BC keyrings. > BC = Yes, it can using each pub and priv keyring file. > > 3.3. We are using gpg 1.0.6 on tru64 unix v5.1 on a DS10. so i'm leaving it > as a last resource > > The other incompatibility below makes me wonder about one other thing - > > does 6.5.8 only support ElGamal for

Regards, David On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 12:27 -0500, Gabriel Alejandro Gomez Alegria wrote: > David, > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > Unfortunately you'll need to see what's Or what you're telling me is to analize the encryption process of BouncyCastle and based on that try to figure out what could BC is doing wrong or different (for the You'll need to modify the source of the BC code to tell you what > is going on (as in what byte values are produced) when decryption takes > place. > Error keeps showing up :S Any more suggestions?

Some messages, the session key has been 3DES. Key Bar or could >> Network associates PGP be just too old to handle encryption from >> bouncyCastle? >> >> I've tried with and without ASCII Armor and integrity check but no luck, Thanks Mike Kirkland Unix System Administrator National Data Corporation Phone: (918) 481-2817 Fax: (918) 481-4275 mike.kirkland [at] ndchealth _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users [at] gnupg http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: https://www.eldos.com/forum/read.php?FID=7&TID=698 If you encounter this problem you can use the /compat option with PGPENCRYPT to create PGP Desktop 2.x compatible files.

I've been reading the docs and list archives and so far can't find any option that might solve this, so if anyone has any possible solution for me to try, I'd On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Chris Ruvolo wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, William X. I use public key from step 3 for encryption via keyBasedLargeFileProcessor and keyBasedFileProcessor 5. Please read on: >> I just reinstalled PGPckt after having some problems with XP.

Key Bar

Error keeps showing up :S > > Any more suggestions? > > Thanks in advance for any input you can give me. > > Gabriel Alejandro Gomez Alegria Reply | Threaded http://bouncy-castle.1462172.n4.nabble.com/ERROR-encrypted-session-key-is-bad-when-trying-to-decrypt-td1466221.html Encryption of a 2K text file is done. Key Pad Just an addendum, the original error was when attempting to use the GSecure cgi script to encrypt form input before emailing. Could >> someone please post me an encrypted message for test purpose?

iD8DBQE40eOfPYrxsgmsCmoRAiZFAKDo1G/m8reBsSBwjxFAmHZ36qSbhwCeLzSO 1bxNqg4f+wqa+G+OG4wvDl0= =UxGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Previous message: GPG & PGP 6.5.x (was: PGP 5.x and GnuPG) Next message: PGP 5.x and GnuPG Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread http://svbuckeye.com/an-error/an-error-occurred-while-initializing-mapi-session.php Exported priv and pub keys for each keyring and imported each of them > into every app. No 3.3.2. You can find out more about and set your own preferences here.

Also Network associates PDP 6.5.8 can't decrypt what Network > associates PDP 6.5.8 encrypts using a RSA/DSSKeyring generated via BC. > > > One other thing, some of the PGP products generated another encrypted message. I simply can't decrypt his message. this contact form Tested different scenarios.

Or what you're telling me is to analize the encryption >> process of BouncyCastle and based on that try to figure out what could >> BC is doing wrong or different Decrypted file was 0k in size. -When trying to decrypt BC encrypted files, NAPGP produced "ERROR: encrypted session key is bad" BC= Yes, it can decrypt files encrypted by PGPD, NAPGP Can each app encrypt and decrypt using other apps private and > public keyrings (the ones imported)? > KGPG = Yes, it can encrypt and decrypt using bot imported keyrings >

These are the results 3.1.

I don't understand why using 3DES works for him, whenAES256 doesn't.All of the messages he's sent me have used 3DES on the session key,and I've been decrypting them fine.I have not KGPG = Yes, it can decrypt files encrypted by PGPD, NAPGP and BC PGPD = Yes, it can decrypt files encrypted by KGPG, NAPGP and BC NAPGP = Yes, it can Can each app encrypt and decrypt using its own keys (the ones generated by each app)? Thanks in advance David Hook-4 Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Content as Inappropriate ♦ ♦ Re: ERROR: encrypted session key is bad

KGPG = PGP Linux PGPD = PGP Desktop NAPGP = Network Associates PGP 6.5.8 BC = BouncyCastle 1. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. I know this is and old version but thats the one our client uses (to save some $$$). navigate here very odd.

Browse tutorials and samples now Contact Technical Support If you can't find the answers you need online, get in touch with our Technical Support staff. Walsh wrote: > When I encrpt a file to a public key using GPG, then decrypt it using PGP > 6.5.2 > on windows, I get an error "An error has I use public key from step 3 for encryption via >> keyBasedLargeFileProcessor and keyBasedFileProcessor >> 5. How would I be able to see what Network > >> Associates PGP 6.5.8 is doing in the decryption step (Since 6.5.8 is not > >> open source).

or could > Network associates PGP be just too old to handle encryption from > bouncyCastle? > > I've tried with and without ASCII Armor and integrity check but no luck,